lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:12:27 -0800 (PST)
From:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
cc:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] anonfd: Make file read-only if fops->write is not set

On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Al Viro wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:46:11PM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/anon_inodes.c b/fs/anon_inodes.c
> > index 2c99459..097f91f 100644
> > --- a/fs/anon_inodes.c
> > +++ b/fs/anon_inodes.c
> > @@ -121,13 +121,13 @@ struct file *anon_inode_getfile(const char *name,
> >  	d_instantiate(path.dentry, anon_inode_inode);
> >  
> >  	error = -ENFILE;
> > -	file = alloc_file(&path, FMODE_READ | FMODE_WRITE, fops);
> > +	file = alloc_file(&path, FMODE_READ | (fops->write ? FMODE_WRITE : 0), fops);
> 
> Good grief, what for?  We are already passing O_NDELAY in flags argument,
> why not add O_RDWR/O_RDONLY to it?  It's not as if we had that many
> callers, after all...

I agree. We're better off explicitly passing the flags instead of doing 
some detection magic.


- Davide


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ