| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:17:25 +0100 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, San Mehat <san@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: sched: restore sanity On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:22:23 -0800 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote: > What are the negatives of using pr_<level>? pr_ is really just for "I am a driver and want a single line message out in a standardized format". Nothing wrong with that. But here you are changing fundamental kernel outputs in the style of an oops message. Multiline, complex and machine parsed things... -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists