[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B4279A1.4090706@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:28:33 -0800
From: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: RFC non barrier versions of dma_map functions
Hello All,
This is a request for extending the DMA api for efficient handling of
multiple buffers or scatter gather mapping/unmapping operations.
I am based on an ARMv7 device and we have a situation where we need
to dma map multiple cached buffers for a single dma transaction.
The current DMA api suggests the use of dma_map_single/
dma_unmap_single for cache consistency. On ARMv7 it performs the
necessary cache-operations and calls data sync barrier instruction
(DSB). In our case we would be executing multiple DSB instructions
before starting the dma operation - we need memory to be consistent
only after we map the last buffer.
I am thinking we could define "no barrier" version's of all the
mapping/unmapping functions and then a barrier function that results
in DSB before the dma is started.
Here are numbers from a test ran on my board.
It kmallocs N buffers of size 'size', dirties their cache by writing
to them and calls dma_map_single that calls the arch specific clean
operations with and without DSB. In "without DSB" case a dsb is executed
after the last buffer is mapped. The time is in microseconds
size N map_single map_single w/o DSB delta
128 16 8 5 60%
512 16 9 6 50%
512 32 15 8 88%
512 48 20 11 82%
512 64 27 14 93%
64 4 4 3 33%
64 8 4 3 33%
64 16 7 4 75%
64 32 12 4 200%
64 48 17 6 183%
64 64 21 7 200%
1024 16 9 7 29%
These buffer sizes and N are very close to real world sizes the
framebuffer driver handles. Cases where N is large happen the most
often.
Clearly,we could benefit from the nobarrier versions of the cache
operations and we could use them in scatter gather mappings as well.
Since this kind of API change will affect all the platforms, I was
directed by the arm-linux community to take this up on the linux kernel
mailing list.
For architectures that don't need a barrier for the completions of
cache operations we can simply call the existing
dma_map_signle/dma_unmap_single.
Requesting alternative ideas or code design to get the desired
nonbarrier versions of the mapping functions.
Thanks,
Abhijeet Dharmapurikar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists