linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] vmstat: remove zone->lock from walk_zones_in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed,  6 Jan 2010 09:33:44 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] vmstat: remove zone->lock from walk_zones_in_node

> > Thanks lots comments. 
> > hmm.. I'd like to clarily your point. My point is memory-hotplug don't take zone lock,
> > then zone lock doesn't protect anything. so we have two option
> > 
> > 1) Add zone lock to memroy-hotplug
> > 2) Remove zone lock from zoneinfo
> > 
> > I thought (2) is sufficient. Do you mean you prefer to (1)? Or you prefer to ignore rarely event
> > (of cource, memory hotplug is rarely)?
> > 
> 
> I think (2) will make zoneinfo harder to use for examining all the counters
> properly as I explained above. I haven't looked at memory-hotplug in a
> while but IIRC, fields like present_pages should be protected by a lock on
> the pgdat and a seq lock on the zone. If this is not true at the moment,
> it is a problem.
> 
> For the free lists, memory hotplug should be taking the zone->lock properly as
> the final stage of onlining memory is to walk the sections being hot-added,
> init the memmap and then __free_page() each page individually - i.e. the
> normal free path.
> 
> So, if memory hotplug is not protected by proper locking, it's not intentional.

ok, I drop this patch. thanks.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/