| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:21:06 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, axboe@...nel.dk, ryov@...inux.co.jp, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, menage@...gle.com, containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] cgroups: blkio subsystem as module On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:10:38 -0500 Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:30:21AM -0500, Ben Blum wrote: > > Convert blk-cgroup to be buildable as a module > > > > From: Ben Blum <bblum@...rew.cmu.edu> > > > > This patch modifies the Block I/O cgroup subsystem to be able to be built as a > > module. As the CFQ disk scheduler optionally depends on blk-cgroup, config > > options in block/Kconfig, block/Kconfig.iosched, and block/blk-cgroup.h are > > enhanced to support the new module dependency. > > > > Hi Ben, > > I will give this patch a try. > > So from blk-cgroup perspective, the advantage of allowing it as module > will be that we can save some memory if we are not using the controller? > Is "moduled" blkio cgroup safe after page-tracking by page_cgroup is introduced ? Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists