linux-kernel - Re: introduce NMI_AUTO as nmi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:13:42 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>, aris@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: introduce NMI_AUTO as nmi_watchdog option

On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:32 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> other architectures have NMI concepts as well, such as Sparc64. 

I think both sparc64 and ppc64 fake NMIs by playing games with hw IRQ
priorities and partial masks. But yes.

One interesting 'feature' for the perf-nmi interaction is creating an
idle scheduling class for counters, because as long as there is a
counter present you can use his NMIs to drive the watchdog, but as soon
as there are non left, you need to install one.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/