linux-kernel - [PATCH] sparc: leds_resource.end assigned to itself in clock_board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:55:55 +0100
From:	Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
To:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sparc: leds_resource.end assigned to itself in clock_board_probe()

These statements appear redundant.

Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
---
Is there any reason to assign this to itself?

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/central.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/central.c
index f3b5466..773caf4 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/central.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/central.c
@@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ static int __devinit clock_board_probe(struct of_device *op,
 
 	p->leds_resource.start = (unsigned long)
 		(p->clock_regs + CLOCK_CTRL);
-	p->leds_resource.end = p->leds_resource.end;
 	p->leds_resource.name = "leds";
 
 	p->leds_pdev.name = "sunfire-clockboard-leds";
@@ -194,7 +193,6 @@ static int __devinit fhc_probe(struct of_device *op,
 	if (!p->central) {
 		p->leds_resource.start = (unsigned long)
 			(p->pregs + FHC_PREGS_CTRL);
-		p->leds_resource.end = p->leds_resource.end;
 		p->leds_resource.name = "leds";
 
 		p->leds_pdev.name = "sunfire-fhc-leds";
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/