linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/64] libata: fix CFA handling in ide_timing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:23:32 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/64] libata: fix CFA handling in ide_timing_compute()

Hello.

Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] libata: fix CFA handling in ide_timing_compute()
>
> Use standard cycle timing for CFA PIO5 and PIO6 modes.
>
> Based on commit 74638c8 for IDE subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/ata/libata-core.c |   17 +++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
> @@ -3211,6 +3211,7 @@ const struct ata_timing *ata_timing_find
>  int ata_timing_compute(struct ata_device *adev, unsigned short speed,
>  		       struct ata_timing *t, int T, int UT)
>  {
> +	const u16 *id = adev->id;
>  	const struct ata_timing *s;
>  	struct ata_timing p;
>  
> @@ -3228,14 +3229,18 @@ int ata_timing_compute(struct ata_device
>  	 * PIO/MW_DMA cycle timing.
>  	 */
>  
> -	if (adev->id[ATA_ID_FIELD_VALID] & 2) {	/* EIDE drive */
> +	if (id[ATA_ID_FIELD_VALID] & 2) {	/* EIDE drive */
>  		memset(&p, 0, sizeof(p));
> +
>  		if (speed >= XFER_PIO_0 && speed <= XFER_SW_DMA_0) {
>   

   BTW, shouldn't this actually be 'speed < XFER_SW_DMA_0'?

MBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/