linux-kernel - Re: RFC: deprecate CONFIG_X86_CPU_DEBUG and schedule it for rapid removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:28:14 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Ozan Çağlayan <ozan@...dus.org.tr>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, stable@...nel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: RFC: deprecate CONFIG_X86_CPU_DEBUG and schedule it for rapid removal

On Monday 18 January 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> CONFIG_X86_CPU_DEBUG really seems to be causing more problems than it
> ever solved.  This is an RFC for immediately deprecating it, and
> schedule it for removal in the 2.6.34 cycle.
> 
> If this was a high value feature, it would be different -- but it's not
> even close.

ACK
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/