linux-kernel - Re: mcs7830 usb net: "scheduling while atomic" danger?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:35:23 +0100 (CET)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Alek Du <alek.du@...el.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: mcs7830 usb net: "scheduling while atomic" danger?

On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Monday 18 January 2010, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > > 
> > > Forgive me, but doesn't that mutex_lock()/msleep() (ab)use mean
> > > risking a "scheduling while atomic"?
> > > (such as discussed in e.g.
> > > http://search.luky.org/linux-kernel.2004/msg92817.html )
> > > 
> > > 
> > > And, if that is the case, shouldn't all such cases simply be killed for
> > > good via a capable semantic patch?
> > 
> > The semantic match shown below finds 55 matches.  All but two involve 
> > mutex_lock.  Those are in the file 
> > /var/linuxes/linux-next/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c
> > in the functions ehci_bus_suspend and ehci_hub_control.
> 
> That code looks indeed broken as was added las July as part of 331ac6b288d9
> "USB: EHCI: Add Intel Moorestown EHCI controller HOSTPCx extensions and
> support phy low power mode". The reason that this hasn't triggered is
> probably the lack of Moorestown machines in the field.

The fix is just msleep -> mdelay?

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/