linux-kernel - Re: what's up with "make -j N" output?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:53:16 +0200
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: what's up with "make -j N" output?

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:24:14PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
>> Script does effectively:
>>
>>       make -k -j5 &>1.log
>
> My automated builds effectively run a number of "make -j 1" builds in
> parallel so I get sane parsable and readable logs.

I do this too, still -j1 is waste of time if only one compile is running
for whatever reason.

> I don't think we give any guarantees for -j 2 or higher even though
> that would be highly desirable when things go wrong.

Meanwhile, bug dissapeared somewhere. :-\
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/