linux-kernel - Re: [Update][RFC][PATCH] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disabling device run-time PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:09:03 -0500 (EST)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc:	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [Update][RFC][PATCH] PM / Runtime: Add sysfs switch for disabling
 device run-time PM

On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> > Why change the name from "level" to "runtime"?
> 
> Because it wouldn't be really obvious what "level" applied to.  For example,
> some people might expect the values of "level" to correspond to PCI power
> states for PCI devices and so on, so it might turn out to be confusing. 

But is the name "runtime" any clearer?  Especially to people who have 
never come across the phrase "runtime power management"?

Does anybody have a suggestion for a better attribute name?

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/