| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:53:56 GMT
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove load_balance_newidle()
Commit-ID: f492e12ef050e02bf0185b6b57874992591b9be1
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/f492e12ef050e02bf0185b6b57874992591b9be1
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
AuthorDate: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:29:42 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:40:14 +0100
sched: Remove load_balance_newidle()
The two functions: load_balance{,_newidle}() are very similar, with the
following differences:
- rq->lock usage
- sb->balance_interval updates
- *balance check
So remove the load_balance_newidle() call with load_balance(.idle =
CPU_NEWLY_IDLE), explicitly unlock the rq->lock before calling (would be
done by double_lock_balance() anyway), and ignore the other differences
for now.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/sched_fair.c | 135 +++++----------------------------------------------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 1040832..de5ab12 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -3010,125 +3010,6 @@ out:
}
/*
- * Check this_cpu to ensure it is balanced within domain. Attempt to move
- * tasks if there is an imbalance.
- *
- * Called from schedule when this_rq is about to become idle (CPU_NEWLY_IDLE).
- * this_rq is locked.
- */
-static int
-load_balance_newidle(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq, struct sched_domain *sd)
-{
- struct sched_group *group;
- struct rq *busiest = NULL;
- unsigned long imbalance;
- int ld_moved = 0;
- int sd_idle = 0;
- int all_pinned = 0;
- struct cpumask *cpus = __get_cpu_var(load_balance_tmpmask);
-
- cpumask_copy(cpus, cpu_active_mask);
-
- /*
- * When power savings policy is enabled for the parent domain, idle
- * sibling can pick up load irrespective of busy siblings. In this case,
- * let the state of idle sibling percolate up as IDLE, instead of
- * portraying it as CPU_NOT_IDLE.
- */
- if (sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER &&
- !test_sd_parent(sd, SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE))
- sd_idle = 1;
-
- schedstat_inc(sd, lb_count[CPU_NEWLY_IDLE]);
-redo:
- update_shares_locked(this_rq, sd);
- group = find_busiest_group(sd, this_cpu, &imbalance, CPU_NEWLY_IDLE,
- &sd_idle, cpus, NULL);
- if (!group) {
- schedstat_inc(sd, lb_nobusyg[CPU_NEWLY_IDLE]);
- goto out_balanced;
- }
-
- busiest = find_busiest_queue(group, CPU_NEWLY_IDLE, imbalance, cpus);
- if (!busiest) {
- schedstat_inc(sd, lb_nobusyq[CPU_NEWLY_IDLE]);
- goto out_balanced;
- }
-
- BUG_ON(busiest == this_rq);
-
- schedstat_add(sd, lb_imbalance[CPU_NEWLY_IDLE], imbalance);
-
- ld_moved = 0;
- if (busiest->nr_running > 1) {
- /* Attempt to move tasks */
- double_lock_balance(this_rq, busiest);
- /* this_rq->clock is already updated */
- update_rq_clock(busiest);
- ld_moved = move_tasks(this_rq, this_cpu, busiest,
- imbalance, sd, CPU_NEWLY_IDLE,
- &all_pinned);
- double_unlock_balance(this_rq, busiest);
-
- if (unlikely(all_pinned)) {
- cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu_of(busiest), cpus);
- if (!cpumask_empty(cpus))
- goto redo;
- }
- }
-
- if (!ld_moved) {
- int active_balance = 0;
-
- schedstat_inc(sd, lb_failed[CPU_NEWLY_IDLE]);
- sd->nr_balance_failed++;
-
- if (need_active_balance(sd, sd_idle, CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)) {
- double_lock_balance(this_rq, busiest);
-
- /*
- * don't kick the migration_thread, if the curr
- * task on busiest cpu can't be moved to this_cpu
- */
- if (!cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu,
- &busiest->curr->cpus_allowed)) {
- double_unlock_balance(this_rq, busiest);
- all_pinned = 1;
- return ld_moved;
- }
-
- if (!busiest->active_balance) {
- busiest->active_balance = 1;
- busiest->push_cpu = this_cpu;
- active_balance = 1;
- }
-
- double_unlock_balance(this_rq, busiest);
- /*
- * Should not call ttwu while holding a rq->lock
- */
- raw_spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
- if (active_balance)
- wake_up_process(busiest->migration_thread);
- raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
- }
- } else
- sd->nr_balance_failed = 0;
-
- update_shares_locked(this_rq, sd);
- return ld_moved;
-
-out_balanced:
- schedstat_inc(sd, lb_balanced[CPU_NEWLY_IDLE]);
- if (!sd_idle && sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER &&
- !test_sd_parent(sd, SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE))
- return -1;
- sd->nr_balance_failed = 0;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-/*
* idle_balance is called by schedule() if this_cpu is about to become
* idle. Attempts to pull tasks from other CPUs.
*/
@@ -3143,16 +3024,23 @@ static void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
if (this_rq->avg_idle < sysctl_sched_migration_cost)
return;
+ /*
+ * Drop the rq->lock, but keep IRQ/preempt disabled.
+ */
+ raw_spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
+
for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
unsigned long interval;
+ int balance = 1;
if (!(sd->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE))
continue;
- if (sd->flags & SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE)
+ if (sd->flags & SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE) {
/* If we've pulled tasks over stop searching: */
- pulled_task = load_balance_newidle(this_cpu, this_rq,
- sd);
+ pulled_task = load_balance(this_cpu, this_rq,
+ sd, CPU_NEWLY_IDLE, &balance);
+ }
interval = msecs_to_jiffies(sd->balance_interval);
if (time_after(next_balance, sd->last_balance + interval))
@@ -3162,6 +3050,9 @@ static void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
break;
}
}
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
+
if (pulled_task || time_after(jiffies, this_rq->next_balance)) {
/*
* We are going idle. next_balance may be set based on
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists