linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v3 0/5] x86, cacheinfo, amd: L3 Cache Index Disable fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2010 09:24:28 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
CC:	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, andreas.herrmann3@....com,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 0/5] x86, cacheinfo, amd: L3 Cache Index Disable fixes

On 01/22/2010 07:01 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> these are a bunch of fixes which correct the disabling of L3 cache
> indexes. This is needed, for example, in the case when excessive
> correctable L3 error rates are observed. In a later step, this
> functionality will be connected to the mcheck mechanism and used to
> evaluate occurring L3 tag and data array errors and then disable the
> respective failing L3 cache regions in order to defer system failure
> before a sysop can intervene.
> 
> Those patches are also good -stable candidates.

Hmmm... I'm not sure I see a strong justification for a late -rc push
into Linus/stable push for for these... I think you would have to
explicitly make the case if you want them to be considered as such.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/