lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:10:04 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
	Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Subject: [20/29] drm/i915: Read the response after issuing DDC bus switch command

2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>

commit 6a304caf0bf9c429fc261f260b86cabf5bde2cbb upstream.

For some SDVO cards based on conexant chip, we can't read the EDID if
we don't read the response after issuing SDVO DDC bus switch
command.

>>From the SDVO spec once when another I2C transaction is finished after
completing the I2C transaction of issuing the bus switch command, it
will be switched back to the SDVO internal state again. So we can't
initiate a new I2C transaction to read the response after issuing the
DDC bus switch command. Instead we should issue DDC bus switch command
and read the response in the same I2C transaction.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23842
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24458
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24522
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24282

Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>
Tested-by: Sebastien Caty <sebastien.caty@...f.gouv.qc.ca>
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c |   57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
@@ -472,14 +472,63 @@ static int intel_sdvo_get_pixel_multipli
 }
 
 /**
- * Don't check status code from this as it switches the bus back to the
- * SDVO chips which defeats the purpose of doing a bus switch in the first
- * place.
+ * Try to read the response after issuie the DDC switch command. But it
+ * is noted that we must do the action of reading response and issuing DDC
+ * switch command in one I2C transaction. Otherwise when we try to start
+ * another I2C transaction after issuing the DDC bus switch, it will be
+ * switched to the internal SDVO register.
  */
 static void intel_sdvo_set_control_bus_switch(struct intel_output *intel_output,
 					      u8 target)
 {
-	intel_sdvo_write_cmd(intel_output, SDVO_CMD_SET_CONTROL_BUS_SWITCH, &target, 1);
+	struct intel_sdvo_priv *sdvo_priv = intel_output->dev_priv;
+	u8 out_buf[2], cmd_buf[2], ret_value[2], ret;
+	struct i2c_msg msgs[] = {
+		{
+			.addr = sdvo_priv->slave_addr >> 1,
+			.flags = 0,
+			.len = 2,
+			.buf = out_buf,
+		},
+		/* the following two are to read the response */
+		{
+			.addr = sdvo_priv->slave_addr >> 1,
+			.flags = 0,
+			.len = 1,
+			.buf = cmd_buf,
+		},
+		{
+			.addr = sdvo_priv->slave_addr >> 1,
+			.flags = I2C_M_RD,
+			.len = 1,
+			.buf = ret_value,
+		},
+	};
+
+	intel_sdvo_debug_write(intel_output, SDVO_CMD_SET_CONTROL_BUS_SWITCH,
+					&target, 1);
+	/* write the DDC switch command argument */
+	intel_sdvo_write_byte(intel_output, SDVO_I2C_ARG_0, target);
+
+	out_buf[0] = SDVO_I2C_OPCODE;
+	out_buf[1] = SDVO_CMD_SET_CONTROL_BUS_SWITCH;
+	cmd_buf[0] = SDVO_I2C_CMD_STATUS;
+	cmd_buf[1] = 0;
+	ret_value[0] = 0;
+	ret_value[1] = 0;
+
+	ret = i2c_transfer(intel_output->i2c_bus, msgs, 3);
+	if (ret != 3) {
+		/* failure in I2C transfer */
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("I2c transfer returned %d\n", ret);
+		return;
+	}
+	if (ret_value[0] != SDVO_CMD_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
+		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("DDC switch command returns response %d\n",
+					ret_value[0]);
+		return;
+	}
+	return;
 }
 
 static bool intel_sdvo_set_target_input(struct intel_output *intel_output, bool target_0, bool target_1)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ