linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:37:59 +0100
From:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc:	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Uwe Kleine-Koenig <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms

> So I see no objection to a mass move of all embedded/system i2c bus
> drivers to a separate sub-directory.

And with the PCA9xxx-controllers? The ISA-driver into non-embedded and the
platform-driver into embedded? Hmmm...

And (in 80 years ;)) there might be just one I2C-maintainer taking care of them
all? Then, why the split?

I am all for taking the embedded-burden away from you, just I am not too fond
of this idea.

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)