| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 23:50:58 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com> To: rostedt@...dmis.org Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: unify arch_syscall_addr() implementations On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:36, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:43 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> Every arch_syscall_addr() implementation thus far is the same, so unify >> them as a default weak in common code so more arches don't have to waste >> time copying & pasting this simple function. The Blackfin version is >> going to be exactly the same. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org> >> --- >> note: only thing that needs double checking is s390 and sparc where they >> declared the sys_call_table as an array of ints. considering this table >> is supposed to be an array of function pointers, this seems like more of >> a typo to me ... > > I would not be too sure. s390 is very strange, and I would definitely > want to get an Ack from the arch maintainers first. i think everyone has checked in with v3 ... -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists