linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Provide ways of crashing the kernel through debugfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:09:50 +0100
From:	Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom@...insight.net>
To:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Provide ways of crashing the kernel through debugfs

On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:53:23 +0800
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:

> >> Hey, we already have /proc/sysrq-trigger, you need to state why
> >> it is better than using /proc/sysrq-trigger.
> >
> > Well, it provides a few more ways of crashing the kernel. That's
> > basically the only additional feature you'll get.
> 
> Yeah, I can see that, but why do I need to care how I crash the kernel
> as long as I can crash it in a way.

I understand what you mean, and I'm fine if this doesn't get merged.

Thanks for the comments!

// Simon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/