| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:32:49 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu] v2 accelerate grace period if last
non-dynticked CPU
Currently, rcu_needs_cpu() simply checks whether the current CPU has
an outstanding RCU callback, which means that the last CPU to go into
dyntick-idle mode might wait a few ticks for the relevant grace periods
to complete. However, if all the other CPUs are in dyntick-idle mode,
and if this CPU is in a quiescent state (which it is for RCU-bh and
RCU-sched any time that we are considering going into dyntick-idle mode),
then the grace period is instantly complete.
This patch therefore repeatedly invokes the RCU grace-period machinery
in order to force any needed grace periods to complete quickly. It does
so a limited number of times in order to prevent starvation by an RCU
callback function that might pass itself to call_rcu().
However, if any CPU other than the current one is not in dyntick-idle
mode, fall back to simply checking (with fix to bug noted by Lai
Jiangshan). Also, take advantage of last grace-period forcing, the
opportunity to do so noted by Steve Rostedt.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/cpumask.h | 14 +++++++++
init/Kconfig | 16 +++++++++++
kernel/rcutree.c | 5 +--
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index d77b547..dbcee76 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -143,6 +143,8 @@ static inline unsigned int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask,
#define for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) \
for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
+#define for_each_cpu_not(cpu, mask) \
+ for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
#define for_each_cpu_and(cpu, mask, and) \
for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask, (void)and)
#else
@@ -203,6 +205,18 @@ int cpumask_any_but(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int cpu);
(cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
/**
+ * for_each_cpu_not - iterate over every cpu in a complemented mask
+ * @cpu: the (optionally unsigned) integer iterator
+ * @mask: the cpumask pointer
+ *
+ * After the loop, cpu is >= nr_cpu_ids.
+ */
+#define for_each_cpu_not(cpu, mask) \
+ for ((cpu) = -1; \
+ (cpu) = cpumask_next_zero((cpu), (mask)), \
+ (cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
+
+/**
* for_each_cpu_and - iterate over every cpu in both masks
* @cpu: the (optionally unsigned) integer iterator
* @mask: the first cpumask pointer
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index d95ca7c..42bf914 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -396,6 +396,22 @@ config RCU_FANOUT_EXACT
Say N if unsure.
+config RCU_FAST_NO_HZ
+ bool "Accelerate last non-dyntick-idle CPU's grace periods"
+ depends on TREE_RCU && NO_HZ && SMP
+ default n
+ help
+ This option causes RCU to attempt to accelerate grace periods
+ in order to allow the final CPU to enter dynticks-idle state
+ more quickly. On the other hand, this option increases the
+ overhead of the dynticks-idle checking, particularly on systems
+ with large numbers of CPUs.
+
+ Say Y if energy efficiency is critically important, particularly
+ if you have relatively few CPUs.
+
+ Say N if you are unsure.
+
config TREE_RCU_TRACE
def_bool RCU_TRACE && ( TREE_RCU || TREE_PREEMPT_RCU )
select DEBUG_FS
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 099a255..29d88c0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1550,10 +1550,9 @@ static int rcu_pending(int cpu)
/*
* Check to see if any future RCU-related work will need to be done
* by the current CPU, even if none need be done immediately, returning
- * 1 if so. This function is part of the RCU implementation; it is -not-
- * an exported member of the RCU API.
+ * 1 if so.
*/
-int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
+static int rcu_needs_cpu_quick_check(int cpu)
{
/* RCU callbacks either ready or pending? */
return per_cpu(rcu_sched_data, cpu).nxtlist ||
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index e77cdf3..c1d97ec 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -906,3 +906,72 @@ static void __init __rcu_init_preempt(void)
}
#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU */
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU) || !defined(CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ)
+
+/*
+ * Check to see if any future RCU-related work will need to be done
+ * by the current CPU, even if none need be done immediately, returning
+ * 1 if so. This function is part of the RCU implementation; it is -not-
+ * an exported member of the RCU API.
+ *
+ * Because we have preemptible RCU, just check whether this CPU needs
+ * any flavor of RCU. Do not chew up lots of CPU cycles with preemption
+ * disabled in a most-likely vain attempt to cause RCU not to need this CPU.
+ */
+int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ return rcu_needs_cpu_quick_check(cpu);
+}
+
+#else
+
+#define RCU_NEEDS_CPU_FLUSHES 5
+
+/*
+ * Check to see if any future RCU-related work will need to be done
+ * by the current CPU, even if none need be done immediately, returning
+ * 1 if so. This function is part of the RCU implementation; it is -not-
+ * an exported member of the RCU API.
+ *
+ * Because we are not supporting preemptible RCU, attempt to accelerate
+ * any current grace periods so that RCU no longer needs this CPU, but
+ * only if all other CPUs are already in dynticks-idle mode. This will
+ * allow the CPU cores to be powered down immediately, as opposed to after
+ * waiting many milliseconds for grace periods to elapse.
+ */
+int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+ int c = 1;
+ int i;
+ int thatcpu;
+
+ /* Don't bother unless we are the last non-dyntick-idle CPU. */
+ for_each_cpu_not(thatcpu, nohz_cpu_mask)
+ if (thatcpu != cpu)
+ return rcu_needs_cpu_quick_check(cpu);
+
+ /* Try to push remaining RCU-sched and RCU-bh callbacks through. */
+ for (i = 0; i < RCU_NEEDS_CPU_FLUSHES && c; i++) {
+ c = 0;
+ if (per_cpu(rcu_sched_data, cpu).nxtlist) {
+ rcu_sched_qs(cpu);
+ force_quiescent_state(&rcu_sched_state, 0);
+ __rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_sched_state,
+ &per_cpu(rcu_sched_data, cpu));
+ c = !!per_cpu(rcu_sched_data, cpu).nxtlist;
+ }
+ if (per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu).nxtlist) {
+ rcu_bh_qs(cpu);
+ force_quiescent_state(&rcu_bh_state, 0);
+ __rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_bh_state,
+ &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu));
+ c = !!per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu).nxtlist;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* If RCU callbacks are still pending, RCU still needs this CPU. */
+ return c;
+}
+
+#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists