linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 05/10] ftrace: Drop buffer check in function profiler callbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:47:38 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/10] ftrace: Drop buffer check in function
	profiler callbacks

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 02:17:29PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Drop the null check on hlist->hash. It is wasteful because
> > we don't register the tracer if the buffer allocation failed,
> > and the memory barrier in register_ftrace_graph() ensure it
> > is visible to the callbacks right away.
> > 
> 
> When it is on a cpu which is just came up, hlist->hash is not
> allocated either.
> 
> See ftrace_profile_init().
> 
> function_profile_call(), profile_graph_entry() and profile_graph_return()
> on a just online cpu are wasteful. I think we need call
> ftrace_profile_init_cpu()(if ftrace_profile_enabled=1) when CPU_UP_PREPARE.



May be yeah, or perhaps we should play with cpu_possible_mask()
instead of cpu_online. Whatever, the patch is also buggy for the reasons
given by Steve, I'm going to drop it until we have a sane implementation
of synchronize_preempted_tasks().

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/