lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:06:08 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
	eranian@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] bitops: Provide compile time HWEIGHT{8,16,32,64}

On 02/01/2010 04:43 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> The below does work, but is still a tad ugly in that if you want to use
> any of the HWEIGHT functions that use BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() you have to
> have included linux/kernel.h yourself.
> 
> But at least it builds on x86_64, alpha and sparc64 (didn't have a ia64
> compiler around).
> 
> FWIW I was tempted to change the return type of hweight64() from
> unsigned long to unsigned int, its not as if it'll ever return a value
> larger than 64.
> 

That might generate worse code in some cases, though (something that
needs it as a 64-bit value would have to extend it unnecessarily), but
probably the easiest is to just compile and see what happens.

x86 also has a POPCNT instruction now, which we should be able to use
via alternatives.  That's something to do after your cleanup is in.

Anyway, I like the cleanup.

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ