lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 4 Feb 2010 21:09:50 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.sf.net,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: hung bootup with "drm/radeon/kms: move radeon KMS on/off
	switch out of staging."

On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:05:59PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> Regressions are not limited to 'same config' kernels, last i checked. If that 
> has changed (or if i'm misunderstanding it) then it would be nice to hear a 
> clarification about that from Linus.

If an option has *never* worked on a given configuration, then it's not 
a regression. That's not a matter of taste, it's a matter of language. 
We prioritise regressions because they mean that someone's previously 
working configuration no longer works. Tying the word "regression" to 
other bugs just to get someone to look at them faster is 
counterproductive.
 
-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ