lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:09:09 +0800 From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [Patch 0/2] sysfs: fix s_active lockdep warning Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >> On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 11:35 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: >>> +#include <linux/sched.h> >> #include <linux/lockdep.h> >> >> should be sufficient I think. > > No, it's not. It leaves MAX_LOCK_DEPTH undeclared. Beats me why that > symbol ended up in sched.h... > because task_struct->held_locks uses it, but it seems better to move it into lockdep.h... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists