lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 6 Feb 2010 16:56:24 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, submit@...stfloor.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haicheng.li@...el.com,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [1/4] SLAB: Handle node-not-up case in fallback_alloc()

> If a hot-added node has not been initialized for the cache, your code is 
> picking an existing one in zonelist order which may be excluded by 
> current's cpuset.  Thus, your code has a very real chance of having 
> kmem_getpages() return NULL because get_page_from_freelist() will reject 
> non-atomic ALLOC_CPUSET allocations for prohibited nodes.  That isn't a 
> scenario that requires a "funny cpuset," it just has to not allow whatever 
> initialized node comes first in the zonelist.

The point was that you would need to run whoever triggers the memory
hotadd in a cpuset with limitations. That would be a clear
don't do that if hurts(tm)
 
> My suggested alternative does not pick a single initialized node, rather 
> it tries all nodes that actually have a chance of having kmem_getpages() 
> succeed which increases the probability that your patch actually has an 
> effect for cpuset users.

cpuset users are unlikely to trigger memory hotadds from inside limiting
cpusets. Typically that's done from udev etc.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ