linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/11] kvm: Change kvm_iommu_map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 07 Feb 2010 14:22:35 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
CC:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] kvm: Change kvm_iommu_map_pages to map large pages

On 02/05/2010 01:01 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>
>> Yes, addresses the concern.
>>      
> Are there any further objections against this patchset? If not it would
> be cool if you could give me some acks for the kvm specific parts of
> this patchset.
>    

There are two ways we can get the kvm bits in:

- you publish a git tree excluding the kvm patches, I merge your tree, 
then apply the kvm specific patches.  This is best for avoiding 
merge-time conflicts if I get other patches for the same area.
- you push everything including the kvm bits.

I'm fine with both, though prefer the former.  If you choose the latter, 
ACK for the kvm patches.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/