lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:11:04 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org> To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>, WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, benh@...nel.crashing.org, miltonm@....com, aeb@....nl Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restrict stack space reservation to rlimit Hi, > Why do we need page size independent stack size? It seems to have > compatibility breaking risk. I don't think so. The current behaviour is clearly wrong, we dont need a 16x larger stack just because you went from a 4kB to a 64kB base page size. The user application stack usage is the same in both cases. Anton -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists