linux-kernel - Re: [RFC perf,x86] P4 PMU early draft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 2010 09:57:35 +0300
From:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC perf,x86] P4 PMU early draft

On 2/9/10, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:45:04PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
>> The main problem in implementing P4 PMU is that it has much more
>> restrictions for event to MSR mapping. So to fit into current
>> perf_events model I made the following:
>
> Is there somewhere accessible on the web where I can read about the P4
> PMU?  I'm interested to see if the constraint representation and
> search I used on the POWER processors would be applicable.
>
> Paul.
>

I've been using intel sdm, from intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/