lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:43:33 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, hjl.tools@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch v2 2/4] x86, ptrace: regset extensions to support xstate

On 02/10, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 02/09, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> >
> > +int xstateregs_get(struct task_struct *target, const struct user_regset *regset,
> > +		unsigned int pos, unsigned int count,
> > +		void *kbuf, void __user *ubuf)
> > +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +	int size = regset->n * regset->size;
> > +	struct xsave_hdr_struct *xsave_hdr =
> > +				&target->thread.xstate->xsave.xsave_hdr;
> > +
> > +	if (!cpu_has_xsave)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	ret = init_fpu(target);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * First copy the fxsave bytes 0..463
> > +	 */
> > +	ret = user_regset_copyout(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf,
> > +				  &target->thread.xstate->xsave, 0,
> > +				  offsetof(struct i387_fxsave_struct,
> > +					   sw_reserved));
> > +	if (!ret)
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Copy the 48bytes defined by software
> > +		 */
> > +		ret = user_regset_copyout(&pos, &count, &kbuf, &ubuf,
> > +					  xstate_fx_sw_bytes,
> > +					  offsetof(struct i387_fxsave_struct,
> > +						   sw_reserved),
> > +					  offsetof(struct xsave_struct,
> > +						   xsave_hdr));
>
> Hmm. Suresh, could you confirm these offsetof's are correct?
>
> We are copying xstate_fx_sw_bytes array which is u64[6], but
> start_pos == sizeof(i387_fxsave_struct) - padding ?

Sorry for noise. Now I see this should be correct, see another email I sent.

In fact, unless I missed something again, the 2nd and 3rd _copyout's could
use pos as start_pos instead of offsetof(what_we_already_copied).

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ