linux-kernel - Re: Linux mdadm superblock question.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:42:47 +1300
From:	martin f krafft <madduck@...duck.net>
To:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
Cc:	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux mdadm superblock question.

also sprach Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com> [2010.02.12.1200 +1300]:
> I may be converting a host to ext4 and was curious, is 0.90 still the
> only superblock version for mdadm/raid-1 that you can boot from
> without having to create an initrd/etc?
> 
> Are there any benefits to using a superblock > 0.90 for a raid-1 boot
> volume < 2TB?

FYI: http://bugs.debian.org/492897

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/

it may look like i'm just sitting here doing nothing.
but i'm really actively waiting
for all my problems to go away.

spamtraps: madduck.bogus@...duck.net

Download attachment "digital_signature_gpg.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)