| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:11:07 -0500 From: James Cloos <cloos@...loos.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: [Regression] Filesystem I/O is CPU-bound in rc7 and rc8 Sometime between rc6 and rc7 all filesystem I/O started using 100% CPU, usually on the order of 60% sys, 40% user. I've tried this with each of ext4, jfs and btrfs filesystems. All show the same issue. Using dd(1) to read from the block specials directly works as well and as fast as it always has; only reading or writing to mounted filesystems is affected. Box is 32-bit x86, PentiumIII-M; drives are ide using libata. If the btrfs fs is mounted, the slowdown is enought to trigger the hung_task call trace (120s) on the btrfs-transac process. But the regression is just as apparent when only jfs and ext4 are mounted. The only filesystems I've found which avoid the regression are tmpfs and devtmpfs. I didn't have time to write up a report when I noticed this in rc7 but had to boot back into rc6 for work. Some of the commits since rc7 looked like they might have addressed this regression, but it persists in rc8. -JimC -- James Cloos <cloos@...loos.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists