linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] of/flattree: Make unflatten_device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:25:14 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, monstr@...str.eu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jeremy.kerr@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] of/flattree: Make unflatten_device_tree() safe to 
 call from any arch

Hi Grant,

On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:11:48 -0700 Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca> wrote:
>
> No reason, just wasn't thinking of that.  I've changed this.

Thanks.  Andrew Morton says that (unless there is a good reason) we
should program the kernel in C not CPP.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped