lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:21:07 +0800
From:	Wenji Huang <wenji.huang@...cle.com>
To:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 5/5] tracing: simplify memory recycle of trace_define_field

On 02/24/2010 04:04 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
> Wenji Huang wrote:
>> Discard freeing field->type since it's not necessary and may be hazard.
>>
>
> It's redundant, but it's safe, because if we run into this failure path,
> field->type is always NULL.

There are two entries to failure path, field->name == NULL or
field->type == NULL. And allocating for field->name is before field->type.

IMHO, field->type is not fixed after initialization, it's
not safe if field->name==NULL goes to failure path.

Regards,
Wenji
>
>> Signed-off-by: Wenji Huang<wenji.huang@...cle.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Li Zefan<lizf@...fujitsu.com>
>
>> ---
>>   kernel/trace/trace_events.c |    4 +---
>>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
>> index c2a3077..3f972ad 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
>> @@ -60,10 +60,8 @@ int trace_define_field(struct ftrace_event_call *call, const char *type,
>>   	return 0;
>>
>>   err:
>> -	if (field) {
>> +	if (field)
>>   		kfree(field->name);
>> -		kfree(field->type);
>> -	}
>>   	kfree(field);
>>
>>   	return -ENOMEM;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ