linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.34] ehci-hcd: add option to enable 64-bit DMA support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:28:08 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
CC:	Yuhong Bao <yuhongbao_386@...mail.com>, david-b@...bell.net,
	greg@...ah.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.34] ehci-hcd: add option to enable 64-bit DMA support

Hello,

On 02/24/2010 09:26 AM, Robert Hancock wrote:
> The fact that Windows 7 is now using the feature also means that there
> aren't likely to be too many machines where the 64-bit addressing is
> reported but doesn't work. Which means that aside from the NVIDIA
> quirk, I think enabling 64-bit addressing should be relatively safe.

(following thread from the ATA side) I'm with Greg on this.  USB2.0 is
quite slow on today's standard and most 64bit machines now have IOMMU
of some kind anyway.  If we have problems on IOMMU (sw or hw)
allocation, I think it should be fixed there.

64bit support even in libata was quite painful with quirky BIOSen, PCI
host controllers, bridges and the controllers themselves.  ATA being a
major secondary storage subsystem, libata had to do it but even then
for many those enabling trials, I think we've lost more than we
gained.  There just isn't much point in trying to enable a shiny new
feature on an aging platform or technology.  The gain might be there
but the downside is we end up catching fallout cases where boot fails
or data corrupts after many months later if we're very lucky.  It's
just not worth it.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/