linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the infiniband tree with the vfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:05:18 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the infiniband tree with the vfs tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the infiniband tree got a conflict in
drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_main.c between commit
ce916e2b935f8b3402da1457ff23b9f9f786c09b ("switch infiniband uverbs to
anon_inodes") from the vfs tree and commit
4169c4a9735d6434c9e39fa81ae5517e3afd4cd8 ("IB/uverbs: Use anon_inodes
instead of private infinibandeventfs") from the infiniband tree.

These two commits purport to do something similar.  Someone should look
at them both and decide which one is right.  For now I have used the
version from the vfs tree - with the addition of the part from the
infiniband tree version that selects ANON_INODES in the Kconfig file.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped