linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the oprofile tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Mar 2010 08:37:36 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the oprofile tree with Linus' tree


* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi Robert,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the oprofile tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c between commit
> 8c48e444191de0ff84e85d41180d7bc3e74f14ef ("perf_events, x86: Implement
> intel core solo/duo support") from Linus' tree and commit
> 27d4a358bf5ef730aacf50696b9b5dfc5e2a87a5 ("perf, x86: rename macro in
> ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE") from the oprofile tree.

Robert: the oprofile tree shouldnt be changing perf_event code in any case, 
please dont push out such patches to linux-next but feed them through the 
usual channels.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/