linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: quantum check tweak --resend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 1 Mar 2010 09:02:34 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, czoccolo@...il.com,
	vgoyal@...hat.com, jmoyer@...hat.com, guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: quantum check tweak --resend

On Mon, Mar 01 2010, Shaohua Li wrote:
> Currently a queue can only dispatch up to 4 requests if there are other queues.
> This isn't optimal, device can handle more requests, for example, AHCI can
> handle 31 requests. I can understand the limit is for fairness, but we could
> do a tweak: if the queue still has a lot of slice left, sounds we could
> ignore the limit. Test shows this boost my workload (two thread randread of
> a SSD) from 78m/s to 100m/s.
> Thanks for suggestions from Corrado and Vivek for the patch.

As mentioned before, I think we definitely want to ensure that we drive
the full queue depth whenever possible. I think your patch is a bit
dangerous, though. The problematic workload here is a buffered write,
interleaved with the occasional sync reader. If the sync reader has to
endure 32 requests every time, latency rises dramatically for him.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/