linux-kernel - Re: yaffs2 NAND fs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:51:59 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Peter Paul <abnominales@....de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: yaffs2 NAND fs

On Tuesday 02 March 2010, Peter Paul wrote:
> I was wondering why the yaffs2 file system has not gone for mainline
> yet. It's rather popular flash file system in the embedded world, while
> it is rather easy to patch a kernel to have yaffs2 support [1] it would
> be even nicer if it was just in mainline.
> The source of the GPLv2 file system can be found at [2]
> 
> [1] http://www.yaffs.net/howto-incorporate-yaffs 
> [2] http://www.aleph1.co.uk/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/yaffs2/

I would guess it's a combination of multiple reasons:

1. It has not been submitted for upstream inclusion, at least not
   during the last few years.
2. We don't have a staging area like drivers/staging for file systems
   in the way that we have for drivers
3. There is now ubifs and (soon) logfs upstream, both of which appear
   to be superior to yaffs in many ways.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/