linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] msdos: add support for large disks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:50:02 -0800
From:	"Daniel Taylor" <Daniel.Taylor@....com>
To:	"OGAWA Hirofumi" <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] msdos: add support for large disks

 

-----Original Message-----
From: OGAWA Hirofumi [mailto:hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 6:02 AM
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Daniel Taylor; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] msdos: add support for large disks

Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:

>> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:17:47 -0800
>> "Daniel Taylor" <Daniel.Taylor@....com> wrote:
>>
>>> In order to use disks larger than 2TiB on Windows XP, it is necessary 
>>> to use 4096-byte logical sectors in an MBR.

> BTW, you can use GPT instead?

Windows XP does not support GPT, although Vista/7 do.

> And to make sure, "4096-byte logical sectors in an MBR" is meaning, the
storage must be supporting 4096B and is using it?

The drives report physical/logical sector sizes of 4096 bytes, which the
kernel correctly detects.  32-bit fields in the MBR are then sufficient for
storage capacites >2TiB (up to 16 TiB), and the storage in struct
parsed_partitions is already sector_t.

>>> Although the kernel storage and functions called from msdos.c used 
>>> "sector_t" internally, msdos.c still used u32 variables, which 
>>> results in the ability to handle XP-compatible large disks.
>>> 
>>> This patch changes the internal variables to "sector_t".
>>> 
>>
>> Please Cc OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> and myself on 
>> this work.

>> BTW, to make sure, this is fs/partitions/, not fs/fat/. So, I'm not sure,
my knowledge is enough or not, and/or you just missed fs/partitions/.

This is definitely a change in fs/partitions (fs/partitions/msdos.c).  I
could not find a maintainer for fs/partitions, but FAT and MBR are vaguely
related.  Andrew Morton asked me to copy you on the change, also.

> Well, I'll make time to check. BTW, basically it sounds good to me except
implementation details. But, I'd like to compare > and check other implement
a bit if possible. IIRC, this is not a well defined specification.

Sanity checking patches is a good idea, particularly from someone who has no
other significant change in place.

> Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/