linux-kernel - Re: -next March 3: Boot failure on x86 (Oops)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:25:29 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Sachin Sant <sachinp@...ibm.com>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: -next March 3: Boot failure on x86 (Oops)

On 03/05/2010 04:47 PM, Sachin Sant wrote:
>> diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
>> index 768419d..f1ed9ea 100644
>> --- a/mm/percpu.c
>> +++ b/mm/percpu.c
>> @@ -373,11 +373,11 @@ static int pcpu_need_to_extend(struct pcpu_chunk
>> *chunk)
>>  {
>>      int new_alloc;
>>
>> -    if (chunk->map_alloc >= chunk->map_used + 2)
>> +    if (chunk->map_alloc >= chunk->map_used + 3)
>>          return 0;
>>
>>      new_alloc = PCPU_DFL_MAP_ALLOC;
>> -    while (new_alloc < chunk->map_used + 2)
>> +    while (new_alloc < chunk->map_used + 3)
>>          new_alloc *= 2;
>>
>>      return new_alloc;

This was a red herring.  +2 is correct.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/