| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 10:04:34 +0545 From: Ravi Kumar Kulkarni <ravikulkarni@...advancedsys.in> To: linux@...mer.net CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...im.org.za Subject: Re: Info on AT91 patches against mainline kernel Hi, > >> >>> You do not necessarily need the at91-patchset from Andrew. >>> 2.6.33 works fine on at91sam9261 without it... >>> >>> Remy >>> >>> >> Thanks for the info. I will try to compile 2.6.33 now. But i got a mail >> from andrew that he updated at91 patchset to 2.6.32 . for clarification jus >> verifying tat u mean from 2.6.33 onwards u don't need at91 patches and >> can directly compile without waiting Andrew's patchset . If tats case then >> Andrew can update that in linux4samdotorg website so that it will be helpful >> > You only need the changes from Andrew in case there is something in > there that you require, you should look at the changelog to be sure. > But, the at91sam9261 is already for several years in mainline and it > works fine (even much older kernels than 2.6.33 will work without it, > for example we used 2.6.24, 2.6.26, 2.6.31 without it), Andrews > patchset is just a set of additional changes that will likely be > pushed to mainline at some time. > > Remy > > got it. thanks a lot for your clarification and info. warm regards, Ravi Kulkarni. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists