lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:56:14 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] lockdep: Move lock events under lockdep recursion
	protection

On Wed, Mar 10 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 01:05 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:35:37AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > Which, btw, throws a new lockdep warning fest:
> > > 
> > > [   42.247718] scsi7 : ioc0: LSISAS1068E B3, FwRev=011b0300h,
> > Ports=1, MaxQ=483, IRQ=26
> > > [   42.281125] BUG: key ffff880c7cb75250 not in .data!
> > > [   42.288346] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [   42.294490] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2706 lockdep_init_map
> > +0x545/0x5f0()
> > > [   42.304013] Hardware name: QSSC-S4R
> > > [   42.309674] Modules linked in: hid_apple usbhid ehci_hcd uhci_hcd
> > usbcore nls_base mptsas(+) mptscsih mptbase scsi_transport_sas igb sg
> > sr_mod cdrom
> > > [   42.332072] Pid: 5197, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc1 #176
> > > [   42.340597] Call Trace:
> > > [   42.345335]  [<ffffffff8107fb8d>] ? is_module_address+0x2d/0x60
> > > [   42.353670]  [<ffffffff81074aa5>] ? lockdep_init_map+0x545/0x5f0
> > > [   42.362154]  [<ffffffff81044648>] warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xd0
> > > [   42.371913]  [<ffffffff810446af>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x20
> > > [   42.380109]  [<ffffffff81074aa5>] lockdep_init_map+0x545/0x5f0
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > This doesn't look related to my patch, it also happen in -rc1 right?
> 
> 
> The per-cpu changes broke lockdep, Tejun already posted patches for
> this:
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/10/76
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/10/79

Ah good, saves me the trouble of locating it, thanks!

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ