linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2 V3] io-controller: Add a new interface "weight

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:38:35 -0800
From:	Chad Talbott <ctalbott@...gle.com>
To:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc:	Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
	Nauman Rafique <nauman@...gle.com>, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 V3] io-controller: Add a new interface "weight_device" 
	for IO-Controller

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
> This still leaves the issue of reaching a gendisk object from request
> queue. Looking into it.

It looks like we have that pairing way back in blk_register_queue()
which takes a gendisk.  Is there any reason we don't hold onto the
gendisk there?  Eyeballing add_disk() and unlink_gendisk() seems to
confirm that gendisk lifetime spans request_queue.

Nauman and I were also wondering why blkio_group and blkio_policy_node
store a dev_t, rather than a direct pointer to gendisk.  dev_t seems
more like a userspace<->kernel interface than an inside-the-kernel
interface.

Chad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/