linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Define CAP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:18:50 +0100
From:	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	SELinux <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@...ch.ncsc.mil>,
	Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
	Andrew Morgan <morgan@...nel.org>,
	"Christopher J. PeBenito" <cpebenito@...sys.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define CAP_SYSLOG

> There is one downside to this patch:  If some site or distro currently
> has syslogd/whatever running as a non-root user with cap_sys_admin+pe,
> then it will need to be changed to run with cap_syslog+pe.  I don't
> know if there are such sites, or if that concern means we should take
> a different approach to introducing this change, or simply refuse this
> change.

*If* this is a problem, would the way to address it not be to permit
syslog if the caller has *either* CAP_SYS_ADMIN or CAP_SYSLOG? (The
only weakness I see in this idea is that it fails to lighten the
hugely overlaoded CAP_SYS_ADMIN.)

Cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Author of "The Linux Programming Interface" http://blog.man7.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/