linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:51:38 +0100
From:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
Cc:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316

Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de> writes:

> On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 at 13:24, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> Post "find /proc/device-tree" output.
>
> I did upload[0] a tarball of /proc/device-tree, please see below the 
> "find" output.
>
> Indeed, there's a /cpus/PowerPC,G4@...2-cache and 
> /cpus/PowerPC,G4@...2-cache#1 in the device-tree. However, from looking at 
> the logfiles, the
>
>    device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,G4@0, renamed to "l2-cache#1"

That's a red herring, the real problem is this:

name 'pulses/rev'

Of course, this name cannot be found in /proc/device-tree, because it
wasn't created.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...ux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/