linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/11] mm,migration: Do not try to migrate unmapped anonymous pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:48:25 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] mm,migration: Do not try to migrate unmapped 
	anonymous pages

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:44:59 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:28:15 +0900
>> Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:34 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
>> > <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:28:08 +0900
>> > > Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> > I think above scenario make error "use-after-free", again.
>> > What prevent above scenario?
>> >
>> I think this patch is not complete.
>> I guess this patch in [1/11] is trigger for the race.
>> ==
>> +
>> +     /* Drop an anon_vma reference if we took one */
>> +     if (anon_vma && atomic_dec_and_lock(&anon_vma->migrate_refcount, &anon_vma->lock)) {
>> +             int empty = list_empty(&anon_vma->head);
>> +             spin_unlock(&anon_vma->lock);
>> +             if (empty)
>> +                     anon_vma_free(anon_vma);
>> +     }
>> ==
>> If my understainding in above is correct, this "modify" freed anon_vma.
>> Then, use-after-free happens. (In old implementation, there are no refcnt,
>> so, there is no use-after-free ops.)
>>
> Sorry, about above, my understanding was wrong. anon_vma->lock is modifed even
> in old code. Sorry for noise.

Nope.  Such your kindness always helps and cheer up others people.
In addition, give others good time to consider seriously something.

Thanks, Kame.


-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/