lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:46:59 -0500
From:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To:	Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.33 crash: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP: EIP: [<c11a018b>]
 assfail+0x1b/0x20 SS:ESP 0068:f687bf14

Justin Piszcz wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 
>> Justin Piszcz wrote:
>>> Specifications:
>>>
>>> 2.6.33
>>> 32bit
>>> Debian Testing
>>>
>>> On Mar 14th, my server hung up:
>>>
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189675] ------------[ cut here
>>> ]------------
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189679] invalid opcode: 0000
>>> [#1] SMP
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189681] last sysfs file:
>>> /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:0e.0/host0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/block/sda/uevent
>>>
>>>
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189704] Process xfssyncd (pid:
>>> 584, ti=f687a000 task=f70fa400 task.ti=f687a000)
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189705] Stack:
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189721] Call Trace:
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189739] Code: 00 e8 ea e5 01 00
>>> 83 c4 14 c3 8d b6 00 00 00 00 83 ec 10 89 4c 24 0c 89 54 24 08 89 44 24
>>> 04 c7 04 24 30 ab 42 c1 e8 7c 11 1c 00 <0f> 0b eb fe 90 55 57 89 cf 56
>>> 89 c6 b8 80 b0 52 c1 83 e6 07 53
>>> Mar 14 00:00:22 server1 kernel: [488470.189739] EIP: [<c11a018b>]
>>> assfail+0x1b/0x20 SS:ESP 0068:f687bf14
>>>
>>> Is this a bug related to AMD (CPU) or XFS?
>>
>> Hard to know without seeing the rest of the stack trace, is this all
>> you got?
> Yes, that was the only entry in the log file, I could not wake up the
> monitor to get any more information.
> 
>>
>> You hit an assertion failure in xfs.
>>
>> Are you running with CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG?
> Nope.
> 
> CONFIG_XFS_FS=y
> # CONFIG_XFS_QUOTA is not set
> # CONFIG_XFS_POSIX_ACL is not set
> # CONFIG_XFS_RT is not set
> # CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG is not set

Ok, then you hit an ASSERT_ALWAYS

There are only a few:

0 xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c xfs_fs_destroy_inode  953 ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE));
1 xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_super.c xfs_fs_destroy_inode  954 ASSERT_ALWAYS(!xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM));
2 xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c  xfs_reclaim_inode     727 ASSERT_ALWAYS(__xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE));
3 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c          xfs_log_notify        376 ASSERT_ALWAYS((iclog->ic_state == XLOG_STATE_ACTIVE) ||
4 fs/xfs/xfs_log.c          xlog_commit_record   1273 ASSERT_ALWAYS(iclog);

but I'm not sure which one you hit since there is no backtrace provided.

-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ