lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:40:01 +0200
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, fweisbec@...il.com, robert.richter@....com,
	perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net, eranian@...il.com, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH] perf_events: fix bug in AMD per-cpu initialization

	On AMD processors, we need to allocate a data structure per Northbridge
	to handle certain events.

	On CPU initialization, we need to query the Northbridge id and check
	whether the structure is already allocated or not. We use the
	amd_get_nb_id() function to request the Northbridge identification.

	The recent cleanup of the CPU online/offline initialization introduced
	a bug. AMD cpu initialization is invoked on CPU_UP_PREPARE callback.
	This is before the CPU Northbridge id is calculated. Therefore no
	processor had a Northbridge structure allocated except the boot
	processor. That was causing bogus NB event scheduling.

	This patch uses the CPU_ONLINE callback to initialize the AMD
	Northbridge structure. This way amd_get_nb_id() returns valid
	information.

	The x86_cpu_up() callback was added. Could not call it cpu_online
	because of existing macro.

	Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
	
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 978d297..016c25a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	void		(*quirks)(void);
 
 	void		(*cpu_prepare)(int cpu);
+	void		(*cpu_up)(int cpu);
 	void		(*cpu_starting)(int cpu);
 	void		(*cpu_dying)(int cpu);
 	void		(*cpu_dead)(int cpu);
@@ -1342,6 +1343,11 @@ x86_pmu_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 			x86_pmu.cpu_starting(cpu);
 		break;
 
+	case CPU_ONLINE:
+		if (x86_pmu.cpu_up)
+			x86_pmu.cpu_up(cpu);
+		break;
+
 	case CPU_DYING:
 		if (x86_pmu.cpu_dying)
 			x86_pmu.cpu_dying(cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
index 358a8e3..584df49 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
@@ -346,6 +346,9 @@ static void amd_pmu_cpu_offline(int cpu)
 
 	cpuhw = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
 
+	if (!cpuhw->amd_nb)
+		return;
+
 	raw_spin_lock(&amd_nb_lock);
 
 	if (--cpuhw->amd_nb->refcnt == 0)
@@ -379,7 +382,7 @@ static __initconst struct x86_pmu amd_pmu = {
 	.get_event_constraints	= amd_get_event_constraints,
 	.put_event_constraints	= amd_put_event_constraints,
 
-	.cpu_prepare		= amd_pmu_cpu_online,
+	.cpu_up			= amd_pmu_cpu_online,
 	.cpu_dead		= amd_pmu_cpu_offline,
 };
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ