linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 42/66] arch/mips/lib/libgcc.h: Checkpatch cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:51:28 +0100
From:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To:	Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@...ma.net>
Cc:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 42/66] arch/mips/lib/libgcc.h: Checkpatch cleanup

On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 04:13:11PM +0100, Andrea Gelmini wrote:

> 2010/3/1 Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>:
> Hi Paul,
>    thanks for your reply.
> 
> > I'll apply the sh part by itself, and I suppose Ralf will do the same for
> > MIPS. I'm a bit confused as to why these were lumped together when 65 out
> > of 66 oneliner patches made no use of ad-hoc grouping.
> 
> After the experience with GregKH, I was looking for others maintainer
> interested in code cleanup. So I sent some patches over random files.
> If you care, I can checkpatch.pl all mips subtree and send you patches (if any).

Feel free to - but remember that the coding style document is a guideline
not something to be followed unconditionally.

  Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/