linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/10] x86: kill smpboot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:34:39 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] x86: kill smpboot_hooks.h

On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote:

> only one user, move it back to smpboot.c
> 
> remove smpboot_clear_io_apic, and only keep smpboot_clear_io_apic_irqs.
> 
> and check nr_legacy_irqs before clear it.

This is not the way how we do that. We move code in one patch and then
do modification in the follow up patch. Doing both makes it harder
than necessary to follow the code change.

As a side note, that changelog for the removal of
smpboot_clear_io_apic is not telling anything why that change is
functional equivivalent to the original code. And I doubt that it's
correct.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/