linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/11] Export fragmentation index via /proc/extfrag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:03:30 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] Export fragmentation index via
	/proc/extfrag_index

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 09:22:04AM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * Index is between 0 and 1 so return within 3 decimal places
> > > > +	 *
> > > > +	 * 0 => allocation would fail due to lack of memory
> > > > +	 * 1 => allocation would fail due to fragmentation
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	return 1000 - ( (1000+(info->free_pages * 1000 / requested)) / info->free_blocks_total);
> > > > +}
> > > 
> > > Dumb question.
> > > your paper (http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1375634.1375641) says
> > > fragmentation_index = 1 - (TotalFree/SizeRequested)/BlocksFree
> > > but your code have extra '1000+'. Why?
> > 
> > To get an approximation to three decimal places.
> 
> Do you mean this is poor man's round up logic?

Not exactly.

The intention is to have a value of 968 instead of 0.968231. i.e.
instead of a value between 0 and 1, it'll be a value between 0 and 1000
that matches the first three digits after the decimal place.

> Why don't you use DIV_ROUND_UP? likes following,
> 
> return 1000 - (DIV_ROUND_UP(info->free_pages * 1000 / requested) /  info->free_blocks_total);
> 

Because it's not doing the same thing unless I missed something.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/